<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <title type="html">???의 군함 이야기: Battlecruiser의-역어에-대해에 달린 최근 댓글/트랙백 목록</title>
  <id>http://danew.net/warship/</id>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="ko" href="http://danew.net/warship/" />
  <subtitle type="html">1850-1950 사이의 군함들 이야기.</subtitle>
  <updated>2010-10-24T07:41:26+09:00</updated>
  <generator>Textcube 1.7.8 : Con moto</generator>
  <entry>
    <title type="html">gforce님의 댓글</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://danew.net/warship/44#comment291" />
    <author>
      <name>(gforce)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://danew.net/warship/44#comment291</id>
    <published>2005-01-04T19:13:07+09:00</published>
    <summary type="html">그러고나서 문득 든 생각. &#039;순양(Cruise)하지 않는 전함은 없으므로 전투순양함이 적합하다&#039;

...</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html">???님의 댓글</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://danew.net/warship/44#comment292" />
    <author>
      <name>(???)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://danew.net/warship/44#comment292</id>
    <published>2005-01-04T19:44:19+09:00</published>
    <summary type="html">어디에서 나온 이야긴지는 몰라도, 좀 웃기는 논리로군요. 그럼 모든 군함은 다 싸우니까 전함이랍니까? 전함도 어뢰정을 쫓기 위해 부포를 달았으니 구축함이 되겠군요 :) 어디에 초점을 맞추었는지가 중요한겁니다.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html">gforce님의 댓글</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://danew.net/warship/44#comment290" />
    <author>
      <name>(gforce)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://danew.net/warship/44#comment290</id>
    <published>2005-01-04T19:11:59+09:00</published>
    <summary type="html">어디에서는 굉장히 간단하게 답을 내렸더랬죠. &#039;전투를 하지 않는 순양함은 없으므로 순양전함이 적합하다&#039;

...뭐랄까, 묘하게 설득력있는 말이었습니다-_-;;</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>

